Today, we are going to discuss the Left-Wing Media’s war on Conservative Women. Some key players in the cultural battle we are covering today are Ballerina Farm, Evie Magazine, Disgruntled Feminist TikTok, and Mainstream Media (and you and I, because we will weigh in on this too).
Before I get into the coordinated Left-Wing attack on Ballerina Farm and Evie, I have to explain the ideological conflict that is truly at hand.
Ballerina Farm and Evie are both categorized as symbols of modern Right-Wing ideology. I, myself, am a proud Right-Wing commentator, but when you hear Right-Wing, you might find yourself immediately jumping to switch that verbiage out for “far-right” because that is what the mainstream media calls it to exaggerate the system of beliefs and paint it a nutty, unhinged, extremist paradigm. The truth is there is quite a spectrum of thought among the American Right at the current moment. We can see that with the current ideological, cultural, and ethnic diversity of the new Republican party. I’m sure you can all reflect on the last Republican National Convention (RNC) going unusually viral compared to its past conventions because of how appealing it has become to your average American. That was unheard of until the last election cycle.
Since when has it ever been cool to be Republican? The vibe shift is here.
At the core of Right-Wing ideology is acknowledging the existence of hierarchies, while the Left seeks to destroy traditional hierarchies. These hierarchies may or may not include religious influence. The Right acknowledges the following familiar hierarchies: product quality, competency, family structure, business success, financial status, social status, beauty, fitness, and nutrition. Individuals and groups can apply “good” and “bad” evaluations to the abovementioned topics.
To illustrate, people, places, and things can be ugly or beautiful. Medicine can be practiced poorly or comprehensively. Women on the Right may prefer to be led by men who are smarter, well-earning, stronger, or bigger than them and may be put off by men who are dumber, earn little, are weaker, or smaller than them. Right-wingers may prefer hiring someone well-known and competent for a task over an unproven rookie.
Left-wing ideology seeks to destroy traditional hierarchies because their existence poses an issue for egalitarianism and equity. They want no hierarchies to preserve the primacy of inclusivity because a hierarchy necessitates exclusion. However, what the Left gets wrong about the Right when it comes to the hierarchy of social status is that were a person desirous of excelling out of their current social strata and coachable to mentorship, a Right Winger is more than happy to show them the path to get there. Right-wingers love the concept of meritocratic betterment and mentorship. The Left would know this if they ever interacted with any…
Acknowledging the existence of hierarchies threatens Left-wing ideology, and Ballerina Farm and Evie magazine are threats due to their inspirational allure, which draws women from all walks of life. The allure of the Left has waned for the contemporary American woman. Recognizing this, the Left is frustrated by the remarkable success of a social media influencer and a women's magazine, both of which have adeptly captured the female demographic's favor.
Below is Evie and Ballerina Farm’s Editorial Film, which is drawing such severe backlash from the Left, for your viewing pleasure and to provide added context to this article.
Hannah Neeleman from Ballerina Farm is married to Jet Blue heir Daniel Neeleman. Both are Mormon. Hannah left a life of ballet to pursue ranching, influencing, and being a stay-at-home mother to 8. However, she made the mistake of going on this journey publicly while being stunningly gorgeous. The problem with Ballerina Farm is not so much that the brand acknowledges hierarchies but that Hannah Neeleman is at the top of several hierarchies: wealth, beauty, homemaking, motherhood, domestic engineering, influencing, etc. She is the archetype that should not be able to exist as it is too perfect, but she does. Hannah is real; she’s not a character written into a film or novel. She breathes air, eats food, gives birth, bleeds postpartum, and puts pants on one leg at a time, just like other women.
Hannah undoubtedly lives this life with the support of her husband’s finances, but she is a feat to be admired and radicalizes women simply by existing. It’s essential to remember that Hannah was successful in her own right before marriage, as she was a Julliard-trained ballerina. Since getting married, ranching, and being a mom to multiples, she competed in Mrs. World two weeks postpartum after her win as the 2023 Mrs. American. Hannah understandably makes some women uncomfortable because she’s a living superwoman. Haha.
However, the correct response to her excellence is to be inspired by her and not seek to hate yourself for failing to live up to the Hannah Neeleman standard. Almost none of us will, and that is okay. We can still be the best and healthiest versions of ourselves without trying to fit into a Hannah Neeleman mold that Hannah isn’t even trying to convince us to fit into.
Hannah and Daniel being Mormon intimidates the Left because they are thriving as a white couple who follow a Christian religion that strongly promotes hierarchies. They make Mormonism and whiteness look appealing. I would love to say race doesn’t matter in this conflict because Hannah inspires plenty of ethnically minority women, myself included. Sadly, it does matter that they are white because the Left is still fundamentally anti-white and believes anyone who is not overtly critical of whiteness is a white supremacist. Hannah and Daniel would understandably have a problem being anti-white, given they are a white family of 10, and it would be unwise to promote a self-deprecating identity in their marriage and family.
It seems Hannah’s most grievous sin against the Left is being an unapologetic, petite, beautiful, blonde, white woman. Keep in mind that right-wing ideology is not necessarily pro-white; more specifically, it is anti-anti-white and acknowledges the success of European cultures. Right-Wing (RW) ideology is more meritocratic than anything else and regularly champions ethnic minorities who have admirable achievements, such as Thomas Sowell, Candace Owens, and Anna Paulina Luna. The more significant theme of RW ideology is that you are judged on your achievements rather than your identity. If you don’t believe me, I recommend you check out the viral clips from this last RNC.
So why is Evie magazine, a silly little girly magazine, such a threat to the global homogenization agenda?
They are incredibly dangerous because they are a force to be reckoned with. Evie provides an alternative to the standard anti-natalist, girl-boss, man-hating, gender-affirming slop being doled out to the female masses.
As it turns out, American women are tired of being fed media slop. They want better for themselves and are putting their hard-earned dollars toward it. You may think women’s magazines are unimportant, but let me tell you, Boomer Women LOVED them and would grab a copy at grocery store checkouts and have their opinions informed from magazines. Women want to get girl banter wherever they can find it; the only problem was before 2019, there was no Conservative women’s magazine–cue Evie!
In just five years since its inception, Evie has captured the attention of the global media landscape. Every mainstream outlet in the world is talking about Evie, including The New York Times, Rolling Stone, Marie Claire, and Vanity Fair.
Their social media metrics have surpassed Cosmo and every competitor, only performing second to Vogue, likely due to a difference in content as Vogue is a fashion magazine and Evie is not. Evie is a comprehensive women’s magazine that can include fashion but also includes topics on dating, health, wellness, fertility, culture, etc. They started with 0 followers as a startup in LA and currently hold an audience firmly split as one-third liberal, one-third conservative, and one-third independent. They are indisputably the Modern Woman’s magazine.
Evie was founded by a lovely, young Catholic family: Gabriel and Brittany Hugoboom, which is so incredibly unfortunate for the Left because Gabriel and Brittany are inspiring and motivating. They have a thriving independent magazine, a women’s fitness app, they’re beautiful (Brittany herself has a history of modeling), and they’re religious–and we already know we can’t have any of that joy, beauty, religiosity, and success out there because it might… appeal to women and get them to question the validity of far-left ideology. It’s too pro-natalist for Brittany and Gabe to be successful entrepreneurs with multiple small kids, given so many celebrity women are propagating the narrative that family would hold them back when it’s done the opposite for the Hugobooms. It has wildly propelled them and focused the pair as an entrepreneurial couple.
With too gleaming a resumé, it was only natural that the Left would accuse Evie magazine of publishing conspiracy theories, as they’ve done for any dissident opinion of high-profile persons, businesses, and publications. Evie is the only women’s magazine that keeps women abreast of politics; proof of this was their early questioning of the COVID-19 vaccine and birth control.
This drew much ire from the Left and was branded as misinformation. We now know the risks of the COVID-19 vaccine and the consequences of its mass administration, but Evie was the only women’s publication bold enough to send stories alleging these claims to print. Evie believed women first when they said the COVID-19 vaccine might have impacted their cycles and forever solidified itself as giving women’s health concerns priority even when deemed unpopular or taboo. It has since been proven that the COVID-19 vaccine did affect women’s fertility.
Evie even went against the Conservative grain in questioning birth control as well. People forget how supportive American Conservatives were of Big Pharma before the pandemic. Evie was wiser and more critical of the hormonal intervention of women’s ovulation. The Left believes this is supportive of a “breeding kink” and a “pro-natalist agenda” when the reality is every single birth control medication comes with inserts that state the risks of using hormonal or non-hormonal birth control. Evie published these known risks openly for all women to see when no mainstream media outlet wanted to cover the topic. It is my prediction that the Left Wing Media will share these risks shortly as more and more women, conservative, liberal, and independent alike, abandon the pill.
The official Evie stance on birth control is they are highly in favor of a woman’s Right to choose to take birth control or refrain from doing so, but demand women be given comprehensive information so they can provide informed consent. They are for the woman’s Right to make a comprehensive decision regarding her fertility and assert that many women to date have been prescribed hormonal and non-hormonal contraception without having given proper informed consent.
I am a fervent supporter and celebrant of Evie because I believe many Conservatives criticize the culture war without taking action. Complaining about the current state of dominant Leftist art isn't enough; one must also strive to create compelling Conservative art, and that is precisely what Evie is doing. Furthermore, Evie is not just participating; they are warriors in what I see as 5th Generation Warfare—a contemporary arena of psychological operations and misinformation. We are in a propaganda war where misinformation is rampant, and the truth is becoming increasingly elusive. Evie fights by firmly and resolutely upholding the truth.
Aside from championing truth, Evie produces much more than a magazine! Let’s discuss Evie and their founders’ additional products and achievements.
Evie developed a sundress for their audience with girl-world’s most highly coveted clothing design feature: a built-in bra. Brittany regularly checked in with Evie’s supporters to ask their desires for the dress, producing something stunning. Sadly, on social media, Conservatives were critical of this endeavor, which was yet another incredible demonstration of their inability to support fellow Conservatives fighting the good fight1. Not a good look, guys. What matters is that we put dollars toward cultural movements in our favor, and supporting Evie does that.
Anyway, the dress was cute, and I bought it after becoming fatigued from hearing RW lamentations on its immodesty, price, and lack of crowd-pleasing fabric. The fabric used was Rayon by the way, a completely natural textile… Mind you, it sold out almost immediately for $129 a pop. It was an undeniable success.
I give the dress a solid 10/10 review and look forward to the new dress Brittany has hinted at developing. Although, I wish she would spill more of the beans on it. We’re begging you, Brittany, please have mercy on the girlies; we need more spoilers.
Brittany and Gabriel expanded their passion for women’s health into an app called 28 Wellness. 28 Wellness is a pioneering app in women’s fitness, focusing on syncing physical activities and nutritional guidance with the natural biological rhythms of the female body, providing a holistic approach to wellness. Basically, you get to learn how to eat and workout like a model. Results may vary, but don’t knock it until you try it. I highly recommend the app to women not looking for high-impact workouts. 28 Wellness isn’t designed to get you jacked; it’s designed to get you healthy!
In concluding our discussion of Evie, it’s essential to understand that although it is considered a Conservative Women’s magazine, it aims to appeal to women from all walks of life who love freedom and family or are curious about those two spheres. If you're a liberal woman, you might find Evie surprisingly engaging, particularly if you have an interest in women’s health and fertility.
Finally, it's important to clarify that critics often mistakenly label Evie as a Christian magazine, which it is not. Evie does, however, maintain a positive stance towards Christianity without being critical of it. The magazine attracts readers from a diverse array of religious backgrounds. Although the founders hold religious beliefs, their aim isn't to engage in apologetics or evangelism; instead, their vision for Evie is to provide a wholesome alternative to what they perceive as the degraded standards of many contemporary women's magazines.
Now, let’s check in on psychotic feminist TikTokers who are seething in hatred for Ballerina Farm and Evie.
The first TikToker we will be looking at is @caroclaireburke, who has authored a TradWife thriller novel whose rights were recently acquired for adaptation into a feature film starring Anne Hathaway. This project is rumored to draw inspiration from Ballerina Farm, with Hathaway portraying a character reminiscent of Hannah Neeleman, a TradWife influencer. In the film, the protagonist is teleported back to 1805, forced to manage traditional chores without modern conveniences. Just so we are clear, these people really hate stay-at-home wives who have babies and bake bread.
Below is her viral video critiquing the Ballerina Farm x Evie collaboration for your viewing pleasure.
Enable 3rd party cookies or use another browser
Onward to our second TikToker, @auntiekilljoy, who started the current misinformation cascade against Evie magazine with the viral clip below she posted to her 239.9K followers, which is riddled with lies. Her bio reads, “I write about abortion every day.” MSN and Express US ran with the lies from the clip below and were forced to delete their articles or risk being sued for misinformation. Of course, they did so with no cited retractions or apologies. Marie Claire still has this misinformation published2.
The central lie that a journalistic game of telephone has propagated is that billionaire Peter Thiel funds Evie magazine as anti-birth-control propaganda. He does not fund Evie magazine at all. However, he did invest in 28 Wellness, a women’s cycle-syncing fitness app that is a separate entity from Evie Magazine. You will see no links to Evie magazine on the 28 Wellness website. Also, 28 Wellness does not share user data with investors, although @auntikilljoy alleges this. Her unsubstantiated critique is further invalidated by the fact that women routinely use social media and give up their information to Silicon Valley conglomerates. Women also use other private applications to track their cycles or their cell phones’ health applications, forfeiting their cycle data to companies.
There is no logical reason to suspect that evil billionaires and governments want our cycle data for RW men to impregnate us or track us down for prosecution after receiving legal abortions. This is all very unhinged for @auntiekilljoy to presume… By the way, if women consent to sex the majority of the time it occurs, I fail to see how they can be trapped in a pregnancy by a man.
The constant Leftist-Feminist-Marxist hysteria is all so tiresome.
In closing, the conflict between the Left, Evie, and Ballerina Farm primarily derives from the Left’s inherent disdain for beauty. The Left hates beauty because beauty is a judge. An individual must make a value judgment for a person, place, or thing to be called beautiful. Being bold enough to call someone or something beautiful means that ugliness must exist. Ugliness and beauty exist as a duo in opposition to one another in a value hierarchy. Beauty is considered more valuable than ugliness, implying there are objective benchmarks to evaluate beauty, which means people, places, or things may not qualify for the highest value based on a person or group’s evaluation.
Further, the Left highly discourages evaluating female beauty entirely, as evidenced by its push for “body positivity,” which has flopped since the emergence of Ozempic. Thin is in again, meaning body positivity was a temporary fluke, and the traditional beauty hierarchy cannot be extinguished. If beauty is truly equal among women, then why are so many overweight or obese women pursuing an Ozempic prescription?
Shouldn’t they be comfortable enough in their skin to remain as they are? They are not comfortable. They never were.
Hannah Neeleman, Brittany Hugoboom3, and Evie magazine champion feminine beauty across all facets of life, extending beyond mere physical appearance. They are staunch advocates for assessing beauty, viewing it as a stronghold of authenticity. For this reason, the Left despises them, while the modern American woman adores them immensely.
I don’t know much about this couple or this magazine, but their lifestyle is pretty contradictory. On the one hand they acknowledge status hierarchies, but it seems to me the husband got lucky by being the son of a really rich guy, and the wife married into that family.
I definitely don’t support the identity politics of the left, and the fact they won’t acknowledge that some things/people are ugly, but it just seems to me like people are pissed off at the fact that these people come across is so accomplished, when in reality it stands on the backbone of second generation wealth.
Evie’s nonreligious conservatism is a good thing imo as the two don’t need to be intertwined